Showing posts with label Mark Rubinstein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mark Rubinstein. Show all posts

Friday, September 29, 2017

‘The Salt Line,’ A Conversation with Holly Goddard Jones:



Mark Rubinstein
Novelist, psychiatrist, physician
September 18, 2017

Photo: Rachel McConoughey

Holly Goddard Jones, the author of The Next Time You See Me, received the Fellowship of Southern Writers’ Hillsdale Award for Fiction and the Rona Jaffe Foundation Writers’ Award. She received her BA from the University of Kentucky and her MFA from Ohio State University. She teaches creative writing at UNC Greensboro.


The Salt Line is set in an undisclosed future. The U.S. has been divided into zones with metropolitan areas behind “salt lines,” rings of scorched earth to protect people from a deadly disease-carrying tick. People behind massive walls inside the salt line live a safe and comfortable life. Only adrenaline junkies venture beyond the lines into the American wilderness.
When one group of thrill seekers ventures beyond the line, they find themselves not only facing deadly ticks, but are held captive by a community of outer-zone survivors determined to protect their own existence.

What made you choose to make ticks such a deadly force in a dystopian novel?

I’d finished my last novel in the summer of 2012 and was between projects. I’d read Scott Smith’s novel, The Ruins, which is a horror novel. I’d never written in the horror genre, and thought it would be fun to do between more ‘serious’ projects. I was in Tennessee and spent a lot of time hiking the trails. I was trying to think of a monster that was small in scale and an everyday phenomenon—one that takes you by surprise. Ticks seemed like a good choice. The feeling I had when I suspected I had a tick on myself was probably the closest I’d ever gotten in real life to that of feeling a monster was behind the door. 
The book started out as sort of horror story with four characters going into the woods. But, because I was inexperienced in horror fiction, I began writing in a more literary style. When I started going down that path, I began adding dystopian elements into the story. I really sort of backed into the notion of these ticks having such deadly powers because I was trying to justify the horror element of the novel. Then, the dystopian aspect of the novel took over.

One can’t help but think of real-life current events when reading “The Salt Line.” Will you talk about that?

I started the novel in 2012, and finished the rough draft in 2015. I was influenced by the events in the news at the time, such as the Ebola epidemic and the notion of protective walls, which go back to ancient times. There were discussions in the news about the relationship between Mexico and the U.S. and drug trafficking. I was looking at that long before Trump became a serious political candidate and the notion of building a wall became part of the news.
In 2016, while revising the novel, Trump became a viable candidate for president. There were already coincidental elements in the book that paralleled things playing out on the national stage, but as I revised the novel, I incorporated more current events into the story. Seeing Trump get the Republican nomination influenced my portrayal of the characters in the book.

Your previous novel, “The Next Time You See Me” is more of a thriller/suspense read as compared to “The Salt Line” which is more dystopian. How did writing this novel compare to or differ from your earlier work?

I’ve been creeping toward genre writing over the course of my writing career. My first book was a collection of short stories with some crime elements. They were somewhat literary with dark themes, but they were handled in a conventual literary way. When I was younger, I read a great deal of genre fiction, but in graduate school, literary fiction was emphasized, so I got away from genre fiction both as a reader and as a writer. With The Next Time You See Me, I still approached writing in a literary way, but when I wrote The Salt Line, I knew much more about the craft of writing speculative fiction. In both books, I enjoyed writing in the third person and doing ensemble points of view in the narratives. I love getting into the heads of characters who aren’t obviously like me—that remained the same in the two books.

Your prose is quite lyrical. Who are your literary influences?

Margaret Atwood, who tries many different modes of writing, inspires me as a writer. From one novel to another, she may write speculative fiction, a thriller, or historical literary fiction. She’s one of my biggest inspirations. I love her work.
I grew up reading a lot of Stephen King’s books, and he’s also influenced my work.

Who are the novelists you enjoy reading these days?

Lately, I’ve been gulping down books. I’ve read all of Tana French’s books. I’ve enjoyed Fiona Barton’s two novels. I feel she has something of a Kate Atkinson vibe. I’ve been reading Ruth Ware’s books and loved Otessa Moshsegh’s book, Eileen.

If you could re-read any one novel as though reading it for the first time, which one would it be?

There are books you read when you’re young and unformed, like Stephen King’s The Stand. I adored it, but I think if I read it for the first time now, some of its magic would not work for me—especially the portrayals of women. I think the book I’d want to re-read would be either Cat’s Eye or Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood.

What’s coming next from Holly Goddard Jones?

I have a contract for a book connected to The Salt Line. It’s not a sequel, but it’s set in the same world, with a different set of characters.

Congratulations on writing “The Salt Line,” a deeply imagined, dystopian novel with beautiful prose and a superb understanding of human psychology.

Mark Rubinstein’s new suspense thriller is “Mad Dog Vengeance,” coming October 15th.



Wednesday, May 10, 2017

A Review That Makes Me Glad I Wrote The Book:




May 4, 2017by

Book Review: Beyond Bedlam’s Door by Mark Rubinstein, MD
by Elise Ronan
MAY 3, 2017

A continuation of the discussion about mental health begun in the book, Bedlam’s Door, Mark Rubinstein, MD, brings insight into another 21 stories revolving around issues that pervade the lives of so many people. Beyond Bedlam’s Door, is a compassionate look into the trials and tribulations of those who suffer from mental illness.

Dr. Rubinstein shows, once again, the humanity of the people who live with a variety of mental health illnesses. He shows their vulnerability to those who lack the compassion of “do not harm.”  He reminds us that respect is a major aspect of how to support and help these patients. By recounting these 21 stories, the author shows us that:

People across a wide spectrum of experience share many commonalities: fear, courage, guilt, perseverance, duplicity, integrity, guile, honesty, strength, weakness, and so many other features, which are part of what makes us human.

The statistics say that 1 in 5 people in the United States suffer from a mental illness.

Yet the stigma around psychiatric illnesses abounds. It is only with books like this one, that teach society that people with mental health illness are merely human beings in need of help. Dr. Rubinstein shows us that the populace needs to be more open, honest, and accepting of those dealing with, and managing,  psychiatric issues. It is only with the negating of the stigma associated with mental illness, that those that suffer from the variety of these illnesses will be able, without shame, to get the support and medical help that they need.

***** Five well-deserved stars!

MAY is Mental Health Awareness Month

Find more information here:


If you, or anyone you know, are in need of mental health support, you can also begin by going to NAMI.org:


This book is available May 15.


Thursday, May 4, 2017

‘Interior Darkness,’ A Conversation with Peter Straub:



By Mark Rubinstein
The Huffington Post
THE BLOG
02/16/2016 07:51 am ET | Updated Feb 16, 2017

Peter Straub

Peter Straub needs no lengthy introduction. As a novelist and poet, he has received many literary honors including the Bram Stoker Award, the World Fantasy Award, and the International Horror Guild Award. In 1965, he earned a B.A with honors in English from the University of Wisconsin at Madison; and one year later, an MA from Columbia University. In 1969, he moved to Dublin, Ireland to work on a Ph.D and began writing professionally. Peter collaborated with Stephen King on two novels, The Talisman and Black House.

Interior Darkness, a collection of 16 short stories written over the course of years, demonstrates Peter Straub’s uncanny ability to blur literary genres and pen short stories ranging widely in length, style and tenor, providing a highly entertaining and unusual volume.

I understand something traumatic happened to you when you were seven years old. Tell us about it, and how it affected you and ultimately, your writing.

I was crossing a street near my house while I was coming home from school. I neglected to look to my left; the next thing I saw was the grill of a car racing toward me. I realized it was way too close and I would never get out of the way in time. An unearthly terror seized me. It was unlike any sensation I’d ever had. It was almost an out-of-body experience. Time was altered so that the car seemed to advance slowly toward me in a series of frames—closer and closer. Then, I experienced a merciful blank.
I was severely injured. I think I died for a while out there on the street. After the accident, came a year of absolute misery, anger, and real unceasing terror. I was totally unprepared to deal with an event of such emotional magnitude.
I underwent a long-term recovery in the hospital. I formed a certain stance toward authority in order to negotiate this awful journey of deprivation and pain. And, I had to deal with adult hospital personnel who couldn’t understand my emotional trauma. My bones were set poorly, and I developed an abscess. Nobody believed there was a problem, but I felt intolerable pain. Finally, my leg had to be re-broken. Imagine having to tell a seven-year old, ‘We’re sorry, Peter, it didn’t go well and we’re going to have to break your leg again.’
It was a long and wretched experience that darkened me forever. It gave me problems I’d have been much happier not to have had.
I did not want to be an injured person. I did not want to be different from others. I did my best to act as though it never happened.
A year later, when I could walk in an almost-normal fashion, I rejoined my class after having missed a year of school. I tried to fit right back into the stream of things and did my best to impersonate a normal child.
In essence, I don’t think I was a child anymore. Kids my age struck me as baffling; they were incapable of talking about anything serious.
My natural inclination toward reading was intensified by the long period of time when I couldn’t do much else. In fact, reading was a golden escape from pain and travail. I was mad about books, and frustrated because I couldn’t talk about them with other eight year olds. I didn’t realize my impersonation of a normal eight year old was flawed. Report cards said, among other things, ‘Peter is talking to himself a little less this year.’ (Laughter). Everyone was telling me to shut up. Actually, I was trying to seal off the space in my mind that kept me so scared.
I had no idea how frightened I had become of nearly everything. Death had come for me—out of the blue. As far as I knew, it could happen again at any time. I was too young to emotionally handle these traumatic circumstances and their aftermath.
The fear never dissipated; it merely became submerged. My impersonation of normality became more accurate, and during adolescence, my anger and disdain seemed normal.
When I became an adult, I wanted to make a living writing because I loved books and narrative. I loved the idea of telling stories, and writing fiction was all I ever wanted to do.
At that time, The Exorcist and Rosemary’s Baby were hugely popular. I thought I’d give that genre a crack. It felt right—immediately. I felt at home, yet didn’t really know why. Of course, I later realized I was dealing with the material of fear. I was channeling it into my writing. I was all too familiar with fear and understood it so well. I could describe it and could induce it in readers. As is often the case in life, paradoxically, the worst thing that ever happened to me turned out to be the best thing that ever happened to me.

So your own frightening narrative eventually became part of your oeuvre.

Yes. The realization only began to crystalize when I was in my forties. Once I got it, I understood that this horrible event I had been told to forget or minimize was actually a central part of my life.
That realization inspired my writing and I think my work went up a notch.

Speaking of your work ‘going up a notch’ your writing is often lyrical. Some would even call it ‘literary.’ How do you feel about your books being classified as horror novels?

That’s a very complex issue for me. It’s occupied more space in my thinking than I should admit. Even when I was happily writing novels intended to scare people, I knew they’d be labelled horror, but I wanted to write books that were as good as they could possibly be. I didn’t want my novels to be limited by the conventions or expectations of any specific genre. If I didn’t write well, I would have felt I had done a disservice to my gift.
As my work evolved and went beyond the definition of a specific genre, I thought it would be agreeable to have readers say, ‘This isn’t just a mystery, horror, or crime novel. This is actually a novel. It has those other elements in it, but it’s a satisfying work of fiction.’
That was my conscious goal, and as it turned out, readers stayed with me. They were moved by these books. I was very, very pleased.
You know, you never really write the book you thought you were going to write. There’s always a more perfect version of it somewhere in the world. I’m still pleased with the books I wrote in the 80s and 90s because I think they were fresh.
I’ve felt for a long time now, really well-written novels, no matter the genre, are worthy of being called art or literature. Take for example, science fiction, a genre which has mutated beyond recognition. If the book is well-written, it becomes a more serious read, one that is not only enjoyable, but is also a profound way of exploring the relationship between the narrative and life.

My favorite story in Interior Darkness is “Mr. Clubb and Mr. Cuff.” Tell us a bit about it.

It started when I reread Melville’s Bartleby the Scrivener. I was stunned by it. It was a work of genius. Part of what was so stunning was that it was enigmatic. It had depth within depth, a quality I love that there’s more to understand than what first meets the eye. Rereading it made me feel I wanted to work with that kind of material and see what would happen. After reading Melville’s story, Otto Penzler invited me to contribute to an anthology about revenge. I realized I could write a Bartleby kind of story having to do with revenge. When I decided to do that, it all fell into place. The story instantly expressed itself in a style I love: it’s slightly parodic, but also incorporates affection along with Nineteenth Century diction; and allowed me to make points about the character without being explicit.
After I’d written a couple of pages, I realized I could end the story in the same voice with which I’d begun it, and have transformative things happen in the middle of the story. I didn’t realize Mr. Clubb and Mr. Cuff would be like a vaudeville team. ( Laughter). In a way, the story wrote itself. When Mr. Clubb and Mr. Cuff had something to say, the words just came out. I just wrote it down. That’s the way it felt.

How do you decide an idea is best for a short story as opposed to being the core of a novel?

I always felt I was emotionally wired to be a novelist. I wanted to write long-form fiction, spending between six months and three years on a single piece. I love interior complexity, which works best in novels. After three or four novels I tried writing a short story.
I took a year off from writing after Stephen King and I wrote The Talisman. After that hiatus, I felt I’d grown rusty, like a musician who could only play an octave on a musical scale. I decided to work on the short story, Blue Rose. I wanted it to be a lead-up to the novel Koko. I thought it would help me hone my writing skills by opening up the avenues in my brain that had been dormant. I loved writing that story.
Unlike with a novel, I’m quite clear about where I’m going when I begin writing a short story. There’s less movement; it’s more manageable; and I won’t have to work on it so long. There’s also a limit to the number and kind of chances I’ll take as compared to a longer work.
With short stories, I can do whatever I like. There were times when I wanted to write short stories but felt I couldn’t afford to take the time. I had to earn a living and meet the costs of everyday life. I had bills to pay. They were paid by writing novels.

What question are you asked in interviews more often than any other?

(Laughter). The question I’m asked most often is, ‘What is it like to work with Stephen King?’

Why do you think that one is asked so frequently?

Steve is a master. As time goes on, he’s become more and more beloved by a vast array of readers. And, as time goes on, he’s more and more productive! There’s a demonic deal somewhere in the works there. (Laughter). The man is a miracle.

You’re hosting a dinner party and can invite any five guests, living or dead, from any walk of life. Who would they be?

Let me think. I’d like to include Hart Crane and Jack Kerouac. So long as they don’t get drunk, they’d be wonderfully interesting. I’d also invite the English psychiatrist, Christopher Bollas. He’d add some rich insights to the conversation. I’d love to have Marilyn Robinson there. She’s one of the most brilliant writers currently breathing. I’m just stunned by her talent. For precision and good manners and to lend some wit to the gathering, I’d invite Marianne Moore, the poet. She and Kerouac might hate each other, but that could make for some fiery conversation.

What’s coming next from Peter Straub?

There may be a third collaboration with Stephen King. We have the germ of a story firmly in place. All we need is time during which we’re both free. Then there’s a book I’ve been working on for a long time. It’s tentatively called Hello Jack.

Congratulations on the publication of Interior Darkness, an engrossing collection of stories taking the reader into an interior world of darkness mixed with comic relief and written with haunting literary beauty.

Mark Rubinstein’s latest novel is The Lovers’ Tango.

Follow Mark Rubinstein on Twitter:





Mark Rubinstein Novelist, psychiatrist, physician:

After earning a degree in business administration at NYU, Mark Rubinstein served in the U.S. Army as a field medic tending to paratroopers of the 82nd Airborne Division. After his discharge he returned to college, went to medical school and became a physician, then a psychiatrist. As a forensic psychiatrist, he was an expert witness in many trials. As an attending psychiatrist at New York Presbyterian Hospital and a clinical assistant professor of psychiatry at Cornell, he taught psychiatric residents, psychologists and social workers while practicing psychiatry. Rubinstein's high-octane thrillers Mad Dog House (2012) and its sequel, Mad Dog Justice (2014), were both finalists for the ForeWord Book of the Year Award. His 2nd thriller, Love Gone Mad, was published in September 2013 and his novella, The Foot Soldier (November 2013) won the Silver award in the 2014 Benjamin Franklin Awards competition, in the Popular Fiction category. His novella, Return to Sandara, (October 2014), won the gold IPPY Award for Suspense/Fiction. Before turning to fiction, he co-authored five self-help books on psychological and medical topics. His latest novel, The Lovers' Tango, won gold medal in popular fiction at the 2016 Benjamin Franklin Awards. To learn more, please visit: